,url-https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tripexpert.com%2Fimages%2Fmarker-fade%402x.png(-2.363509,51.386158)/-2.365804575383663,51.3867940019191,15.632557665467859/1280x214@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoidHJpcGV4cGVydHdlYiIsImEiOiJja2Fud3l2MDcwbXZ0MndyeGF3eGI3ZWhzIn0.zLqNa1RECyZZadF8zfQM5w)
Royal CrescentvsThe Circus
Royal Crescent and The Circus are both highly recommended by professional reviewers writing for major publications. Overall, Royal Crescent ranks slightly better than The Circus. Royal Crescent scores 85 with approval from 2 sources such as Michelin Guide, Lonely Planet.
Royal Crescent
Lonely Planet
Michelin Guide
Bath BA1 1EE
From $0/night
Lonely PlanetTop choice
"A walk east along Brock St from the Royal Crescent leads to The Circus, a ring of 33 houses divided into three semicircular terraces." Full review
Michelin Guide 3 Stars
"This symbol of Bath, the major achievement of John Wood II, was built between 1767 and 1774." Full review
The Circus
Fodor's Lonely Planet Michelin Guide
North of Queen Square, Bath BA1 1EE
From $0/night
Fodor's "John Wood designed the masterful Circus, a circle of curving, perfectly proportioned Georgian houses interrupted just three times for intersecting streets." Full review
Lonely Planet "Arranged over three equal terraces, the 33 mansions overlook a garden populated by plane trees. " Full review
Michelin Guide 3 Stars
"The houses are built of pale Bath stone and decorated with coupled columns; they have three storeys rising to a frieze and acorn-topped balustrade." Full review
