Map

The Ryder Hotel vs Fulton Lane Inn

Both hotels are recommended by writers. Overall, King Charles Inn is the choice of most reviewers compared to Fulton Lane Inn. King Charles Inn has a TripExpert Score of 72 with accolades from 2 publications like Frommer's, oyster.com.

The Ryder Hotel
The Ryder Hotel
7 / 10
237 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC 29401
From $199 /night
  • Bar/Lounge
  • Free Internet
  • Laundry Service
  • Concierge
  • Restaurant
  • Pool
show all amenities
Oyster Oyster
Mid-Range
"This...property, located on busy Meeting Street, delivers more amenities than the average downtown Charleston inn, including a pool, a lounge, and free parking." Full review
Star Service Star Service
"At Hasell Street, this U-shaped, three-story contemporary study is a good choice for frugal travelers who want to keep Charleston's sultry southern charm at an arm's distance." Full review
Frommer's Frommer's
"One block from the Historic District's market area, this three-story hotel has rooms that are better than you might expect from a motel and are likely to be discounted in the off season." Full review
Fodor's Fodor's
"Though the King Charles Inn was erected in 1958, the property sits on land that’s held hotels since the early 1800s." Full review
Condé Nast Traveler Condé Nast Traveler
"Locals and newcomers mix at this stylishly modern boutique hotel in the heart of downtown Charleston" Full review
i
The retro, sunny mural helps but you might want to request an outward facing room.
Show All Reviews
Fulton Lane Inn
Fulton Lane Inn
7 / 10
202 King St, Charleston, SC 29401
From $139 /night
  • Hot Tub
  • Free Internet
  • Free Breakfast
  • Laundry Service
  • Concierge
  • Business Center
show all amenities
Fodor's Fodor's
"This inn is both lovely and quirky: its Victorian-dressed rooms... are laid out in a bit of a floor-creaking maze, but it adds to the inn's individuality." Full review
Travel + Leisure Travel + Leisure
"Stay at this unassuming inn in the heart of Charleston’s downtown." Full review
Zagat Zagat
3.8
"This romantic hideaway in a "secluded" but central location along King Street is "well worth the price" say fans, thanks to “spacious”, "beautiful" sleeping quarters."