Park Hyatt MelbournevsQT Melbourne
Both properties are recommended by those who travel for a living. Overall, Park Hyatt Melbourne scores significantly higher than QT Melbourne. Park Hyatt Melbourne comes in at 86 with accolades from 7 reviewers like Fodor's, Concierge and Jetsetter.
Park Hyatt Melbourne
Concierge
Fodor's
Jetsetter
Tablet
Travel + Leisure
Star Service
Lonely Planet
Oyster
Condé Nast Traveler Travel + Leisure Show All Reviews
1 Parliament Square, Melbourne, Victoria 3002
From $202/night
- Bar/Lounge
- Hot Tub
- Free Internet
- Room Service
- Shuttle Bus
- Laundry Service
Concierge "The city's most luxurious large hotel, the 240-room Park Hyatt, really is on a park—Fitzroy Gardens—just opposite St. Patrick's Cathedral and a stroll from the city center."
Fodor's "Set right next to Fitzroy Gardens and opposite St. Patrick's Cathedral, this is one of Melbourne's most elegant hotels." Full review
Jetsetter "Centrally located Melbourne sleep with a pool, tea lounge and expansive restaurant." Full review
Tablet18.7
"Like the city it calls home, the Park Hyatt Melbourne is unpretentiously grand, almost shy of attention." Full review
Travel + Leisure "Well-rounded 20-story hotel with Art Deco-style interiors and a top-notch spa, next to the Fitzroy Gardens downtown." Full review
Star Service "For demanding dignitaries and finicky well-heeled travelers, there is no better choice in Melbourne. " Full review
Lonely Planet "Resembling a Californian shopping mall from the outside, the interior understands luxury to be about wood panelling, shiny surfaces and miles of marble." Full review
OysterLuxury
"Sitting just outside city’s center in East Melbourne, this 240-room luxury hotel stands out for its abundance of features, including a spa, pool, and tennis court." Full review
Condé Nast Traveler "The hotel's opulent facilities and enormous rooms are a world unto themselves, but downtown Melbourne is just across the park." Full review
Travel + Leisure "Ever so slightly set back from the bustle of the CDB grid and surrounded by manicured parks and the Fitzroy Gardens, Park Hyatt Melbourne feels like a luxurious oasis while remaining a stone's throw from the action"
Melbourne Travel Guide
August 16, 2021
QT Melbourne
Wallpaper Lonely Planet
Mr & Mrs Smith
The Telegraph
Time Out Condé Nast Traveler
Afar Magazine Tablet
Michelin Guide
133 Russell Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
From $140/night
- Bar/Lounge
- Free Internet
- Room Service
- Laundry Service
- Concierge
- Restaurant
Wallpaper "It’s a match made in hotel heaven: the country’s quirkiest accommodation brand and a city renowned for its creative bent." Full review
Lonely PlanetTop choice
"Rough concrete surfaces, brass trim, lifts with tapestry light boxes that play house music and say random stuff in a Russian accent." Full review
Mr & Mrs Smith "Spacious suites, amazing art installations and buzzy nightlife await at QT Melbourne, in the heart of the city’s Central Business District." Full review
The Telegraph8.0
"The hottest hotel in town." Full review
Time Out "Rooms have an orient-meets-Wall Street vibe, with timber floorboards, glamorous en suites and QT’s “please-don’t-make-me-get-up-I-don’t-want-to-get-up” gel-topped beds." Full review
Condé Nast Traveler "The QT Melbourne, located close to the best of downtown, feels like a traditional boutique hotel that's been hit by millions of volts of electricity." Full review
Afar Magazine "Check your traditional hotel notions at the door of this Russell Street lodging. At QT Melbourne, guests are greeted on arrival by cheery Directors of Chaos, who sport the same black..." Full review
Tablet "QT Melbourne takes over a 1930s cinema on Russell Street, complete with neon sculptures, video screens, and a wall of 6,000 books. Even the elevators crack jokes as you ride up. The 188..." Full review
Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand
"QT Melbourne takes over a 1930s cinema on Russell Street, complete with neon sculptures, video screens, and a wall of 6,000 books. Even the elevators crack jokes as you ride up. The 188..." Full review
New York Times
